ASDF: An Autonomous and Scalable Distributed File System . many of the same goals as previous distributed file systems such as scalability. Distributed File System (DFS) could be a set of consumer and server .. Huang and Huan-Ming Liang, “ASDF: An Autonomous and Scalable Distributed. File. 3 / Abstract. We have simulated SimpleFS, a simple and scalable distributed file system for nowadays highly Other file systems, like TidyFS, ASDF, Ceph, etc, utilize similar concepts but take more .. ASDF: An Autonomous and. Scalable.

Author: Akinok Shakall
Country: Papua New Guinea
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 7 March 2010
Pages: 324
PDF File Size: 7.89 Mb
ePub File Size: 13.48 Mb
ISBN: 181-8-55393-358-7
Downloads: 20623
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tauzil

This can cause a lot of confusion and pain. You therefore should be careful to never compare pathnames or use them as keys in a hash-table without having normalized them, at which point you may as well use the namestring as the key. A negative infinity marker implemented as boolean nil also serves to mark as no dependency. To make the loading of library code more predictable, ASDF 2 added an: A popular one, since the late s, was make.

In an undocumented stroke of genius, Andreas Fuchs had been making explicit in the DAG the implicit sequencing done by traverse! This caused much grief when we filee to make dlstributed not a subclass of module anymore, but both be subclasses of new abstract djstributed parent-component instead.

It was an immediate success. A number of schemes pertaining to QoS issues are critically analyzed to point out their strengths and weaknesses. On the wsdf hand, because users were not relying on new features, but instead wrote kluges and workarounds that institutionalized old bugs, there was no pressure for providers to update; indeed the pressure was to not update and risk be responsible for breakage, unless and distrbuted the users would demand it.

A break in the clouds: And so we introduced a new operation, initially called parent-load-op 2. Another painful configuration management issue with ASDF 1 and 2 was lack of wystem good way to conditionally include files syetem on which implementation is used scalqble what features it supports. Users still have to enable the modified syntax at autonomos beginning of every file, and carefully disable it at the end, least they cause havoc in other files or at the REPL see Safety before Ubiquity.


In this paper, we propose a distributed file system, called ASDF, to meet the demands of not only data-intensive applications but also end users, developers and administrators. Now, as it traverse d the action graph, ASDF was propagating a force flag indicating whether an action needed to be performed again in the current session due to some of its dependencies itself needing to be updated.

They still have to otherwise avoid non-standardized behavior and implementation-specific extensions if they want their programs to be portable. I remained the main developer until release 3. Starting with ASDF 2, things became much simpler: The greatest source of portability woes was in handling pathnames: A portable solution involved using merge-pathnames inside a reader-evaluation idiom.

International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS)

If anything, some complexity had been moved autonimous the function compute-action-stamp that computes timestamps and deals with corner cases of missing inputs or missing outputs, which was 48 heavily commented lines of code 67 as of 3. Actually, the situation is much worse: But nothing else was both portable and easy.

Like late s variants of DEFSYSTEM on all Lisp systems, it featured a declarative model to define a system in terms of a hierarchical tree of componentsecalable each component being able to declare dependencies on other components. As a trivial instance, the basic ASDF invocation was the clumsy asdf: The many subtle rules constraining build operations could be automatically deduced from these andd, instead of having to be manually specified by users.

ASDF 3, or Why Lisp is Now an Acceptable Scripting Language (Extended version)

Furthermore, because the truename resolved Unix symlinks, you could have symlinks to all your Lisp systems in one or a handful directories that ASDF knew about, and it could trivially find all of them. These warnings notably include forward references to functions and variables.


Most programmers are familiar with C, but not with CL. Several systems andd available to help you define an evaluator for your command-line argument DSL: Importantly, though, this distriibuted is distinct from the preceding graph of components: ASDF notably made copious use of aifa variant of if that implicitly and “non-hygienically” a a variable it to the condition expression in its success branch. There is also an abstraction layer over the less-compatible legacy implementations, a set of general-purpose utilities, and a common core for the ASDF configuration DSLs.

1 Ceph Distributed Storage Sage Weil DreamHost / new dream network April 7, 2011.

There again, an underspecified standard ended being counter-productive. When we released ASDF 3, we declared the feature as deprecated: On the one hand, it minimizes overhead to writing build system extensions.

They were eventually renamed, with backward compatibility stubs left behind asdt the old name. ASDF 3 is the latest rewrite of the system. Many implementations also had notable bugs in some corner cases, that we discovered as we added more tests that ASDF worked well with logical-pathnames; this suggests that logical pathnames are not a widely used feature.

As third, and related, explanation, Lisp has historically encouraged an interactive style of development, where scalabble compile very fast, while the programmer is available at the console. In cloud computing, the computational resources of different vendors and IT services providers are managed for providing an enormous and a scalable computing services platform that offers efficient data processing coupled with better QoS at a lower cost.